Whenever I write a tech-based article, Copyleaks flags it as AI-generated content! Highly disappointed!

Very useless AI detector. I have written my work and you flag it as 100% AI content. DONT WORK WITH SUCH. please improve , you are very useless. I posted my 2019 assignment and you detect AI content

Very sad to write this review. Is there a way to give this software 0 stars? Anyway, I have been writing (academic and Content) since 2010, before AI writing, such as ChatGPT and Bard. Yesterday, I wrote a 2 paged client work. So I used Copyleaks to confirm if it was human-written, and then boom! I am a 70% Robot. But, how can you detect that the work I wrote 5 years ago is 93% AI? How can you detect a story I was writing about my life to be 60% AI-generated? Today, it forced me to spend 10 hours working on 1 page, just to make it sound like a human. Sad. Recommendations for Copyleak - Improve on your product. Give your model more human-written data. Recommendations for Writers - Just read my review and decide. "Hope Copyleak will not mark this review as AI-generated"

It always says that my own words are AI words. This software is a joke.

VERY USELESS DETECTOR! HOW CAN YOU TELL ME A JOURNAL PUBLISHED IN 2007 WAS AI GENERATED? ITS JUST STUPIDDDD!

Se supone que es un trial y pretenden cobrarme?? Con los reviews pésimos que tienen aca, ni loco les pago.

You only detected the content as human written if it has mistakes. How can i use grammarly to correct two spelling mistakes and then you flag all my work as AI generated? Don't you think this will kill dreams of millions of students and professionals by giving false information ?

The wrong information was provided. I wrote an article entirely by myself, My manager used this tool to check for plagiarism, and it provided incorrect information saying that it is AI-generated content and I lost the job. Unfair and dangerous

horribly wrong!!! Do a little twitching with Grammarly, and now you are AI.

Renowned for its meticulous outcomes and steadfast adherence to its stated commitments, Copyleaks is an excellent instrument of scholarly exactitude. This tool has been ingeniously designed to cater to an expansive demographic, encompassing industrious academics, rigorous researchers, and innovative content producers. The high-caliber efficiency embodied by Copyleaks is underpinned by a precision-driven detection capability that combs through textual compositions for any instances of replication or plagiarism. Its striking accuracy and unwavering dependability demarcate this software as an indispensable asset within academia and the professional realm. By leveraging the remarkable prowess of the latest technological developments and intricate algorithms, Copyleaks diligently scans and dissects documents down to their minutiae to dredge up any concealed instances of infringed content. Encased in an astutely structured interface that places user accessibility at the forefront, navigating this software remains refreshingly straightforward, even for those modestly acquainted with the technology. To facilitate comprehension on an exhaustive scale, Copyleaks generates a comprehensive dossier detailing evidence of plagiarism detected, complete with insightful analysis fostering rigorous further examination. A crucial highlight of Copyleaks lies in its extensive range of integration potentials. By enabling effortless amalgamation with myriad platforms and applications, it significantly broadens user accessibility beyond ordinary bounds. The paramount confidence instilled by Copyleaks regarding the uniqueness and legitimacy of your written work is unparalleled. Despite any latent skepticism about its abilities, I wholly encourage taking advantage of the trailblazing capabilities firsthand. Rest assured, you will be pleasantly surprised by the exemplary performance metrics coupled with unimpeachable specificity that form the cornerstone of Copyleaks' reputation. Venture into experiencing it yourself; truly, seeing is believing.

It was one of the few plagiarism checkers that actually showed the sources which the students used/ copied and whether AI technology was utilized or not. Many similar checkers were unable to effectively provide such a detailed report.

Using Copyleaks has helped virtually eliminate plagiarism and A.I. use in my classroom.

Unreliable, flagging everything as AI generated. I tested a document I wrote in 2015 and still detected AI garbage.

I've used ai to paraphrase sentence in my work, usually being careful as the content have not been generated by ai but instead paraphrased and further paraphrased using quillbot and hand written changes which is have been considered 100% human in all other available ai checker, but only copy leaks dispays it as 97% so i thought that maybe i lacked content which was not enough to be correctly detect and as such scanned the whole paragraph that i've written myself along with that 1 sentence and suprise even my whole personally written paragraph is considered as ai generated.. guess i'm an ai seeing that even what i write on my own instead of paraphrasing research is considered to be 80%+ ai generate. ps: i checked what i've written here on copy leaks again and even this is considered as 21% ai generated also copyleaks if you see this, stop advertising yourself as the most accurate when you aren't even close to being the supposedly 98%+ accurate

I love Copyleaks! I like to get fresh ideas from ChatGPT and then an outline for my articles. After writing I use Copyleaks to check for Plagiarism just to be sure. I would recommend Copyleaks to anyone looking for a Plagiarism Checker. Carol Barnes

Detección de IA muy ineficiente. Contenidos 100% humanos los detecta como IA, no recomiendo su uso

My experience with the CopyLeaks AI Checker left me utterly bewildered and frustrated. This so-called plagiarism detection tool not only failed to deliver on its promises but also displayed a shocking lack of understanding, mislabeling original content as AI-generated. It is safe to say that this platform is nothing short of a foolish endeavor. One of the fundamental issues with CopyLeaks AI Checker is its propensity to incorrectly identify original content as AI-generated or plagiarized. Despite submitting entirely authentic and unique documents, the tool repeatedly flagged sections as potential instances of plagiarism. This glaring error undermines any trust one might have had in the system's capability to differentiate between genuine content and plagiarized material. How can we rely on a tool that cannot distinguish between original work and AI-generated text? Furthermore, the platform's inability to comprehend the context and nuances of the submitted documents is utterly baffling. The algorithmic approach employed by CopyLeaks AI Checker seems incapable of recognizing the distinct voice, style, and intent behind different pieces of writing. Consequently, it haphazardly marks portions of original content as potentially plagiarized, leading to a lack of confidence in the system's accuracy and intelligence. Not only does this mislabeling of original content reflect poorly on the tool's functionality, but it also hampers the overall user experience. Spending valuable time submitting authentic work only to have it flagged as AI-generated or plagiarized is frustrating and counterproductive. It exposes the superficiality and lack of sophistication of the CopyLeaks AI Checker's algorithms, making it an impractical and ineffective platform. Given these significant shortcomings, it is evident that the CopyLeaks AI Checker is a monumentally flawed platform. Its inability to accurately identify original content, coupled with its failure to comprehend contextual nuances, renders it a foolish and unreliable tool. If you value the integrity of your work and seek a genuine plagiarism detection solution, I strongly recommend exploring alternative platforms that demonstrate a better understanding of originality and context.

Copyleaks, as an integrity-checking tool, lacks reliability and should not be marketed as an "AI" detector. When a story summary exhibits close similarities, Copyleaks erroneously labels it as "AI," whereas it more accurately falls within the realm of unintentional plagiarism. Claiming to be "reliable" and "trustworthy" is deceptive advertising, misrepresenting the tool's true capabilities and accuracy.

I wanted to try the free trial and provided all my data, but it was not possible. I have been forced to pay. So I cancelled my account.

This review concerns the AI detection. The AI detection for copyleaks is inaccurate. I will demonstrate to you why you should avoid it. I scan a 7 page paper in copyleaks at 7.40 AM later in the day and it does not flag any content as AI content. i recheck the paper once more AT 6.30PM and this thing flags almost half of the content as AI written. I go a step further to scan the same content using turnitin which shows that the the content is entirely human written. To build confident in this result, i go a step further to confirm this using other softwares like GPTKIT [which uses 6 probabilistic models], GPTZERO, and ZEROGPT which confirms the content is NOT! AI WRITTEN as copyleaks alludes. Your AI detection capability is very unreliable!!!!