Useless site

You don't even deserve a 1 star! This is the worst platform I have ever come across. First of all, how can credible references be flagged as AI generated? Secondly upon checking my paper in other platforms, the result was 0% but upon checking with copyleaks it is flagged as 100% ai generated. Thirdly, a minor edit like adding 2 full stops is enough to change the results. Imagine spending all your time working on a paper only for it to be falsely flagged? ABSOLUTE SCAM! WASTE OF TIME AND RESOURCES. AVOID THIS PLATFORM AT ALL COST AND THANK ME LATER.

Ensuring your work is your own and properly site your work is always essential. As tools evolve like AI, students want to use them, but there is a proper and improper way. Copyleaks ensures you don't cross that line as a student, or if you did that, you can correct your work in an educated and clear manner.

Copyleaks' recent performance is disappointing. It flagged my fully human-written content as AI-generated, which undermines its credibility as a reliable detection tool. Such false positives create unnecessary confusion and frustration. If the system cannot distinguish accurately, it raises serious concerns about its effectiveness and the trust users can place in it. AVOID IT AT ALL COST

Copyleaks has always been a reliable tool for checking AI content until recently when they implemented their faulty version V7.1 which they had tried some months ago and failed. This version detects anything written in English as AI-written. I cannot recommend a person to use it as it gives a false positive result. What version V7.1 suggests is that V6.1 was 100% faulty because if you today scan a document which was scanned a week ago and showed 0% AI written today it will shamelessly read 100% AI written. THE ENGINEERS BEHIND THE MODELS MUST HAVE IMPROVED....WHAT A SHAME TO THE PREVIOUS ENGINEERS WHOSE WORKS WAS 100% FAULTY.

This is the most hectic website I have come across since I started my job. I have burning my midnight to my end, but I was surprised to bypass my research paper through this platform, which shows 100% AI-generated text. I have done my dissertation again from Chapter one to Chapter 4 for like 2 months, but I was surprised by copyleaks to detect it as 97% AI-generated text. Please, if possible, let's avoid this platform. They are giving false results. Your time, effort, and knowledge will be in vain if you pass your paper through this platform. Please! Please! Please! Avoid it.

Excelente , programa que me favoreceu bastante, indicarei para outros acadêmicos

I wish I could give 0 stars. This so called AI detector unnecessarily detects human text to AI. I spend long hours on writing my articles but it flagged the complete article. How is this possible?it is a threat to genuine content writers.who work hard to write quality content. Do not rely on copyleaks. It's just a scam

Achei muito interessante

This thing does not work

Thanksss you

excelente produto.

It says 100% AI to a text I wrote mainly. DO NOT buy it if you want to use it for AI detection. Also it started the scan without my consent so it used all my tokens at once..

It's good :)

Does not work as intended.

Good , very good

Good reports generated

Very good and professional

Extremely excellent

Pretty bad! First of all, pretty scummy dark-patterny design. They offer a cheap subscription, however very small it's mentioned that their service only includes a VERY limited number of words. My masters thesis (around 30k words) wasn't being able to be scanned without paying extra. And oh boy, paying extra is really expensive! I would have had to spend more than 150% of my initial payment to be able to scan everything. In my plan, only 25k words were included. So they wanted additional 15$ for 5k words. Ridiculous! So I trimmed some stuff of which I knew had no possibility of being plagiarised and scanned it. They advertise with "multi language" support, but I feel like they cope very bad with German text. They were only able to find matches from my references section (duh). I also feel they dont really have access to academic sources, since they were only ever able to compare to the publicly accessible parts of an academic source, which made it utterly useless, borderline scam. USE OTHER SERVICES, WOULD NEVER USE AGAIN!