
Bahaa Hussein
China | 17 August 2021In the beginning, my articles were mostly rejected because of the English language. But when I got to know this institute and started editing and revising my articles with them, the acceptance rate of the articles became very high. Thank you very much for your help in this field. Bahaa Hussein Taher Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Zaid Al-Hamdan
Jordan | 17 August 2021Excellent job

Professor Ana
Brazil | 17 August 2021the corrections to my article were very good.

Rute Abreu
Portugal | 17 August 2021It is very efficient and easly. To be honest, I stay very well surprised with all the comments and improvements made. And for us as authors , yoy have answer in time and help us with review process. Usually, I do not comment, but your behaviour in these days, it was very accurate and fair.

Filippo Maria
Italy | 17 August 2021Perfect service, fast and precise

Pedro Arantes
Brazil | 17 August 2021My experience, in general, was very good. I just had a problem with formatting. The reviewer didn't follow all style guide. But I think it was a simple mistake. Everything else was very good!

Alejandro Cataldo
Chile | 17 August 2021Excelent service, My only concern about the service is fee doesn't include extra charges not informed in the quote

Juan Serrano-S�nchez
Germany | 17 August 2021I am not happy with the service provided by Proof-Reading-Service.com. From the looks of the website and the prices I expected more than just a simple spelling and grammar check. I could do it online and for free. I can understand very well that they do not change the content, word choice or writing style, as it can drastically change the author's work. However, if there is a sentence that is not well understood or whose wording is not natural, why are the client not notified?

Alberto Faria
Portugal | 17 August 2021Very professional, and kept up to the deadline as agreed.

Lucky Gill
Canada | 17 August 2021Met all expectations. Delivery was timely. Very professional.

KJ
Thailand | 17 August 2021I used this survice for 5-6 years. In the past 2-5 year agro, this survice is a good Proof read. However,in this year, I used this proofread many time and the quality drops significantly. Many mistake are found and not responsible for it. I got bad experiance and change to othor survice that better than this.

JGG
France | 17 August 2021Single word corrections were good, while text editing did not significant add to the linguistic quality of the manuscript

Michal Kočí
Czech Republic | 17 August 2021High quality proofreading

Tariq Irtaimeh
Jordan | 17 August 2021It was great experience dealing with prrof reading service .extremely professional expertise in their field and you are most punctual. Nice dealing with your company

MARIUS VACARELU
Romania | 17 August 2021A good service

Martin de
Netherlands | 17 August 2021Great, fast and very adequate service for acceptable price!

Jon Peddie
United States | 17 August 2021It was a great edit, not a mechanical one, it showed thought and understanding of the context

Muhammad Asif
Pakistan | 17 August 2021There were multiple mistakes in the proofread document. 1. However was used two times in the same sentence 2. In so many paragraphs in addition to 'the' no other corrections were done. 3. Data was used as singular 4. Instead of a antiviral simple antiviral was used and lot more.

Utoomporn Surayot
Thailand | 17 August 2021Very good and very fast service

Roger Keller
Brazil | 17 August 2021Very good, quick and efficient. I will use it again.